AAT Discussion Board

Home \ AAT Discussion Board
elis78665230141
 
Notifications
Clear all
elis78665230141
elis78665230141
Group: Registered
Joined: 2023-12-20
New Member

About Me

When people take note of the term Unified Theory, several times called the Grand Unified Theory, or perhaps even "Theory of Everything," they are probably thinking of it in terms of physics, in which a Unified Theory, or individual theory proficient at determining the dynamics of the interrelationships among nuclear, electromagnetic, and gravitational forces, would reconcile apparently non-complementary facets of many area theories to create one detailed set of equations.

 

 

Such a theory could potentially unlock all the strategies of nature and the universe itself, or as theoretical physicist Michio Katu, puts it "an equation an inch in length that would allow us to read the mind of God." That's how important single theories could be. Nevertheless, single theories don't have to deal with such heady topics as physics or the nature of the universe itself, but may be applied to far more routine things, in cases like this nutrition.

 

 

Regardless of the subject, a unified theory, as sated above, seeks to explain apparently incompatible areas of different theories. On this page I attempt to unify opposing or incompatible seemingly views about nutrition, specifically, what's likely the longest running debate in the nutritional sciences: calories vs. macro nutrients.

 

 

One particular college, I would say the' old school' of nutrition, keeps weight loss or maybe weight gain is all about calories, and "a calorie is a calorie," regardless of the source (e.g., fats, carbs, or proteins). They base the role of theirs on numerous lines of evidence to come to that particular conclusion.

 

 

The alternative school, I will call a lot more the' new school' of thought on the issue, would state that getting or perhaps losing weight is truly about where calories are sold from (e.g., carbohydrates, fat, and proteins), and that dictates weight-loss or even weight gain. Meaning, they feel, the "calorie is a calorie" mantra of the old school is wrong. They too come to this conclusion using various lines of evidence.

 

 

View this site has been a regular debate between folks in the subject of nutrition, biology, physiology, as well as numerous other disciplines, for years. The outcome of which includes led to conflicting help and advice and a great deal of confusion by the general public, not to mention a lot of health professionals along with other organizations.

 

 

 

 

Before I go any further, 2 tips that are vital to understand about any single theory:

 

 

 

 

An excellent unified theory is understandable, concise, and simple even to lay people. Nonetheless, underneath, or even behind that concept, is normally a good deal of info which can take up numerous volumes of books. And so, for me to outline all of the information I've used to get to these conclusions, would have a large book, if not several and it is far beyond the range of this post.

 

 

 

 

Author Bio

 

 

He's the author of Bodybuilding Revealed which shows you how to gain sound muscle mass drug free and Weight loss Revealed which reveals precisely how you can be healthy, ripped, and lean completely naturally.

 

 

Find out more at http://www.bodybuildingrevealed.com as well as [ http://www.fatlossrevealed.com]

Location

Occupation

View this site
Social Networks
Member Activity
0
Forum Posts
0
Topics
0
Questions
0
Answers
0
Question Comments
0
Liked
0
Received Likes
0/10
Rating
0
Blog Posts
0
Blog Comments
Share: